Please note that some questions and comments may not be suitable for this public page. Please read the Question/Comment Submission Rules thoroughly before submitting a question or comment to this site.

Showing posts with label food service. Show all posts
Showing posts with label food service. Show all posts

Monday, April 2, 2012

Lean fine textured beef (LFTB), a.k.a. "pink slime"

Question: Will B-P be opting out of the "pink slime" ground beef for the cafeteria?

Answer: Broadalbin-Perth doesn't actually have the option to "opt out" of using lean fine textured beef (LFTB), which is sometimes referred to as "pink slime." Like other public school districts nationwide, B-P relies on government commodity foods, which are distributed through the Office of General Services (OGS) in New York State.

We recently received some information from OGS about LFTB:
  • There is no way for us or OGS to tell if LFTB is in the beef that we use. It is not listed separately on the ingredient list because LFTB is, in fact, beef.
  • The OGS will order product free of LFTB beginning during the 2012-13 school year. However, the OGS must deplete its current inventory first, so it could be the middle of the school year before districts begin receiving LFTB-free beef.
  • "The USDA stands firmly behind the safety of this product."
- answered by Stephen Tomlinson, Superintendent of Schools

Friday, February 11, 2011

What are the exact cost savings for outsourcing transportation and food service?

Question: Could the exact cost savings numbers (as they relate to outsourcing transportation and food service) please be posted on Plain Talk? Could you please detail our contractual obligations, which do not allow us to outsource food and transportation? If contractual obligations exist it seems as though putting such discussions in front of tax payers is deterring tax payers from addressing the more productive ideas.

Answer: Because you posed several related questions, I thought it wise to address them at once.

Outsourcing of these services is not precluded by the contracts which are in force; however there is a very significant challenge to doing so. The CSEA contract is set to be renegotiated this year, so this is a relevant discussion.

The Taylor Law (http://www.perb.state.ny.us/stat.asp) holds that boards of education are not able to unilaterally outsource business functions which have previously been the exclusive domain of a bargaining unit. This means that the bargaining unit would have to vote in agreement with the outsourcing. This is an unlikely scenario, to be sure.

However, it’s important to note that the round-table discussions are informational in purpose. It is not useless for taxpayers to be made aware of the challenges involved in making changes to the district. We agree that it’s important not to dwell on things that can’t be changed. We regard it as also important to cover areas that people may be curious about – participants walk away knowing more than they knew before.

It’s also worthwhile to note that the next few years may introduce large changes from the state government, including changes to the Taylor Law. If taxpayers are well informed on topics such as these then they can more effectively advocate for changes.
-answered by Ed Szumowski, Board of Education Vice President

Tuesday, January 18, 2011

Outsourcing costs, budget documents and salary questions

Question: Is there a location on the B-P website where taxpayers can see dollar amounts attached to budget ideas being considered for the 2011-12 budget? If not, I would like to request that B-P share on its website some true dollar amounts, costs and savings for budget ideas being considered.

I would like to know the approximate cost savings of outsourcing B-P's food/lunch program and the approximate cost savings of outsourcing our transportation. This cost savings number might potentially include the sale of some buses on the B-P equipment list.

As a taxpayer and employee in the private sector, I, like many taxpayers, have had to accept a pay freeze for several years, and many of us have had to do this in an attempt to sustain our own employment.

With that idea in mind I would like to request information on what the approximate dollar savings would be if the entire B-P staff (administrative, support and teaching) were all to agree to NO pay increase in the coming 2011-12 school year. I believe this is a legitimate item that should be on the table for discussion.

I am hoping the cost savings numbers that I have requested can be shared so I can better understand our situation and I am hoping it will allow us to make informed decisions and help us all decide where to concentrate our efforts. It seems we are discussing combining athletic programs, what I consider a potentially negative impact on our school and students, and we are considering this prior to committing to smaller steps such as outsourcing food and transportation, both of which I believe have less impact on our school and students.

Answer: All public schools in New York are required to make their budget documents available to the public, both online and in school offices at least two weeks prior to the budget vote. At B-P, we strive to make the budget development process as transparent as possible through our community roundtable forums and the information that we put online and in our newsletters.

In regards to outsourcing, please see the minutes from the last community forum [click here]. At this forum, which was held on Dec. 13, community members weighed the pros and cons of outsourcing our food or transportation services. In the end, the community’s opinion was that there is a much bigger picture to outsourcing than first appears. Community members felt that outsourcing could lower district morale, take away our control in some areas and potentially compromise quality. In addition, our current contractual obligations prohibit outsourcing.

Some time ago, after a thorough investigation into the costs of outsourcing, the district committed to operating a transportation department and has even made infrastructure upgrades to the bus garage through a voter-approved capital project. Because of the investment we have made, the district feels it would be somewhat irresponsible to make the decision to outsource transportation at this time.

Outsourcing could also have a potentially negative effect on the entire B-P community given that almost 70 percent of our non-instructional staff members live within the district. If we were to outsource these positions, we would have less control over how the programs operate and whether the affected employees would be rehired to work in the district.

In the end, we feel it is a better decision to accept the loss of a potential small savings that outsourcing may provide to maintain the quality and control of our programs.

If the entire B-P Central School District staff (administrative, support and teaching) all agreed to NO pay increase in the coming 2011-12 school year, the cost savings would be $860,516.
-answered by Stephen Tomlinson, District Superintendent

Tuesday, January 19, 2010

Consolidating services

Question: I went away from the Community Roundtable on employee compensation very informed. I hope that we can look at consolidating services where appropriate - perhaps bringing in an outside vendor to run our food service program?

Answer: I'm glad you found the latest Community Roundtable informative. We're always trying to find the most cost-effective ways of doing business, and we have explored the possibility of bringing in an outside vendor to run our food service program. However, we are bound by certain contractual obligations, and we found that bringing in an outside vendor would not necessarily be a cost-saving measure.
- answered by Stephen Tomlinson, District Superintendent